According to a report by Al Jazeera, Phyllis Bennis, programme director at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, DC, has voiced skepticism about U.S. President Donald Trump’s 20-point proposal to end the war in Gaza. She argued that the framework lacks meaningful assurances for Palestinians and could allow Israel to resume military operations at will.
Bennis warned that the plan does not include mechanisms to ensure a permanent halt to hostilities. “There is every indication that if, at any point, Israel decides that it wants to go back to the war, it will do so,” she said.
Her remarks suggest that without clear enforcement measures, the proposal may serve Israel’s immediate interests without addressing long-term stability.
She also raised concerns about the timing of hostage releases, a central feature of Trump’s plan. According to Bennis, Israel might comply only until its citizens are returned, after which it could claim that the terms of the agreement were not being met. “As soon as Israel gets their hostages back under the plan, they could turn around and say: ‘Well, we’re just not getting the kind of cooperation that we expected with this, so we’ve got to go back to war,’” she explained.
Critics like Bennis argue that such loopholes leave Palestinians vulnerable, as the plan prioritizes Israeli security without offering comparable protections for Gaza’s population. While Trump’s initiative has been presented as a pathway to de-escalation, concerns remain that it may entrench existing power imbalances rather than foster a lasting peace.
Her comments reflect a broader debate in Washington and beyond over whether the proposal represents a genuine step toward resolution or simply a short-term pause that leaves open the possibility of renewed conflict. See, More, Here>>>>
Explore More News By Using The Button Above
Leave a Reply