Maryam Sanda: “They Said She Stabbed Him, Then Broke Down Crying, That Is The Work Of Shaytan

According to a report by Daily Post on Thursday, October 30, 2025, Ahmad Gumi, controversial Islamic cleric, has described the presidential pardon granted to Maryam Sanda as the best approach, following her conviction for killing her husband, Bilyaminu Bello, in 2020.

Gumi spoke about the case in a post on Facebook, emphasizing Sanda’s remorse and framing her actions as influenced by Shaytan. He pointed out that her immediate regret after the incident reflected her recognition of wrongdoing.

Maryam Sanda was initially sentenced to death for the murder of her husband.

The case drew national attention when President Bola Tinubu granted her a pardon, alongside 174 other convicts, which included individuals convicted of drug trafficking, kidnapping, and fraud, the pardon was widely covered and became a topic of public discussion.

Following the announcement of the pardon, public criticism and outrage grew, prompting President Tinubu to revoke the pardon

The revocation was communicated in a statement released by his media aide, Bayo Onanuga, clarifying the change in decision, this reversal sparked debates on the use of presidential powers in granting clemency.

Despite the revocation of the pardon, Sanda’s sentence was adjusted on compassionate grounds.

Authorities reduced her punishment to twelve years in prison, taking into consideration the welfare and future of her children, this decision aimed to balance justice with humanitarian concerns.

In his commentary, Gumi highlighted Sanda’s emotional response to her actions, he described how she stabbed her husband and immediately broke down crying over his body.

According to him, her reaction indicated that her actions were influenced by Shaytan rather than an absence of remorse or moral awareness.

Gumi further stated that understanding the circumstances surrounding the incident is important. He argued that her behavior after the act demonstrated genuine repentance, and he framed the situation within the context of human vulnerability to negative influences. His comments stressed the need to recognize the complexity of human actions in criminal cases.

The case continues to attract attention due to its legal and social implications. The discussions around presidential pardons, the handling of high-profile criminal cases, and the role of compassion in sentencing remain central to public discourse. The focus on Sanda’s reduced sentence underscores ongoing debates about justice and mercy within the legal system.

According to him, “They said she stabbed him, then broke down crying over his body. Do you understand? That is the work of Shaytan….Discover ~ More

Find Verified News At Your fingertips Click The Button Below. ⬇️