According to Jerusalem Post, an opinion article published by The Jerusalem Post has argued that the ongoing conflict involving Iran is driven less by Israel and more by a broader geopolitical contest between the United States and China.
In the piece, the writer challenges widespread claims that Israel pressured Washington into war, noting that “ignorant influencers and populist politicians” often argue that Israel “dragged America into the war with Iran” and that Tehran posed no “imminent threat” to US interests. The article dismisses such views as overly simplistic, suggesting instead that global power dynamics are the real driving force.
Referencing Donald Trump, the article states critics believe he entered the conflict to “cement his reputation as an international bully,” but insists that this interpretation ignores what it describes as a much larger strategic calculation. According to the analysis, there are “two chessboards in play,” one focused on Israel and Iran, and a larger one centered on the future of global dominance.
The article argues that Iran has effectively become a strategic extension of China’s influence, describing it as “the most significant Chinese forward base outside of East Asia.” It further claims that China’s relationship with Iran allows Beijing to exert influence over critical النفط shipping routes, including the Strait of Hormuz.
Citing expert commentary, the piece notes that Iran sells the majority of its oil to China, providing a key revenue stream for Tehran while deepening economic dependence. It also highlights claims that China supplies technology supporting Iran’s communications systems and surveillance capabilities.
“Iran has made itself utterly dependent on China,” the article states, arguing that weakening Tehran would directly impact Beijing’s strategic position. It adds that “when Iran began to rely on China so much, it stopped being Israel’s problem and became America’s.”
The article also points to China’s limited response during the conflict, noting that Beijing has not intervened militarily. Analysts quoted suggest that China “is not equipped to protect its friends against this kind of action,” and does not operate traditional military alliances like Western powers.
Ultimately, the piece concludes that the conflict reflects a larger global struggle, asserting that “America went to war in Iran because Iran made itself a Chinese weapon,” and warning that “the loudest voices in the debate are still arguing about the smaller chessboard” while the real battle unfolds on a broader geopolitical stage…..See More
Leave a Reply